<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short jBPM Performance Showdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2008/04/14/short-jbpm-performance-showdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2008/04/14/short-jbpm-performance-showdown/</link>
	<description>Small steps with big feet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pou</title>
		<link>http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2008/04/14/short-jbpm-performance-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>pou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=5#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Great!!!
Now that you have a testsuite, why don&#039;t you try to do a multithreading tests. What application is going to execute processes one after the other. Probably your app will execute lot`s of process instances at the same time.
Try this, and please, post your results.
Also, if you want, read:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&amp;op=viewtopic&amp;t=133647&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&amp;op=viewtopic&amp;t=133647&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!!!<br />
Now that you have a testsuite, why don&#8217;t you try to do a multithreading tests. What application is going to execute processes one after the other. Probably your app will execute lot`s of process instances at the same time.<br />
Try this, and please, post your results.<br />
Also, if you want, read:<br />
<a href="http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&amp;op=viewtopic&amp;t=133647" rel="nofollow">http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&#038;op=viewtopic&#038;t=133647</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joram Barrez</title>
		<link>http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2008/04/14/short-jbpm-performance-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Joram Barrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=5#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Andries,

You are correct, the jBPM logging is really valuable and necesary. I was wrong in formulating my opinion about it: I merely wanted to state that the jBPM logging certainly needs some kind of revision, given the bad performance.

(btw: Process 3 was indeed pasted twice, thanks for noticing! I can&#039;t believe I didn&#039;t see that when i reviewed the post)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andries,</p>
<p>You are correct, the jBPM logging is really valuable and necesary. I was wrong in formulating my opinion about it: I merely wanted to state that the jBPM logging certainly needs some kind of revision, given the bad performance.</p>
<p>(btw: Process 3 was indeed pasted twice, thanks for noticing! I can&#8217;t believe I didn&#8217;t see that when i reviewed the post)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andries Inzé</title>
		<link>http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2008/04/14/short-jbpm-performance-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Andries Inzé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=5#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Impressive results, excellent post.

Although I do disagree with your point, that you don&#039;t need the jBPM logging. Bugs in process definitions are hard to spot as it is. You need all the logging you can get.

btw: Process 3 is pasted twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive results, excellent post.</p>
<p>Although I do disagree with your point, that you don&#8217;t need the jBPM logging. Bugs in process definitions are hard to spot as it is. You need all the logging you can get.</p>
<p>btw: Process 3 is pasted twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.237 seconds -->

