Comments on: jBPM goes BPMN! http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/ Small steps with big feet Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:26:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: TommieBRIGGS http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-4015 TommieBRIGGS Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:52:58 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-4015 The <a href="http://bestfinance-blog.com/topics/business-loans" rel="nofollow">business loans</a> are very useful for guys, which are willing to ground their organization. In fact, it is not hard to receive a sba loan. The business loans are very useful for guys, which are willing to ground their organization. In fact, it is not hard to receive a sba loan.

]]> By: Joram http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3973 Joram Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:16:43 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3973 @Sebastian: userTask is not at all a custom tag name, bot a core tag of the spec. The default implementation attribute is webservice, which is a secondary use case for use, hence the 'other' usage. @Sebastian: userTask is not at all a custom tag name, bot a core tag of the spec. The default implementation attribute is webservice, which is a secondary use case for use, hence the ‘other’ usage.

]]> By: Sebastian Schneider http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3971 Sebastian Schneider Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:52:07 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3971 What’s the reason for using custom tag names like userTask instead of the implementation-section to distinguish between different kind of tasks? Is this going to be changed? What’s the reason for using custom tag names like userTask instead of the implementation-section to distinguish between different kind of tasks? Is this going to be changed?

]]> By: Sebastian Schneider http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3970 Sebastian Schneider Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:50:18 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3970 What's the reason for using and not ? What’s the reason for using and not ?

]]> By: Joram http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3949 Joram Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:42:21 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3949 @Rafael: The Eclipse plugin is not BPMN2 enabled (at the moment). For the query on variables, I believe that's planned for the next release (4.4) @Rafael: The Eclipse plugin is not BPMN2 enabled (at the moment). For the query on variables, I believe that’s planned for the next release (4.4)

]]> By: Rafael http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3948 Rafael Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:29:04 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3948 Hello Joram, Congratulations for the new version, PVM running both standards seamlessly is really impressive! I am adding JBPM to an application and am very excited about the possibilities, but I have 2 problems I'm stuck with: - How can I import my Signavio 3.6.5 BPMN2 xmls into the eclipse plugin? Is it BPMN2 enabled? - I need to perform queries applying filters to my variables, is there a way to do this through the framework? Thanks! RP. ps. What would be the best forum for questions like these? Hello Joram,
Congratulations for the new version, PVM running both standards seamlessly is really impressive!

I am adding JBPM to an application and am very excited about the possibilities, but I have 2 problems I’m stuck with:
- How can I import my Signavio 3.6.5 BPMN2 xmls into the eclipse plugin? Is it BPMN2 enabled?
- I need to perform queries applying filters to my variables, is there a way to do this through the framework?

Thanks!

RP.

ps. What would be the best forum for questions like these?

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3931 Sebastian Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:04:25 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3931 Thank you for this great post, Joram! Thank you for this great post, Joram!

]]> By: BPM-Guide.de It’s Business Process Management » BPMN 2.0 wird ausführbar – und für jeden verfügbar! http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3930 BPM-Guide.de It’s Business Process Management » BPMN 2.0 wird ausführbar – und für jeden verfügbar! Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:11:36 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3930 [...] erstes lauffähiges (!) Beispiel hat Joram vom jBPM-Team auch bereits online gestellt: jBPM goes BPMN. Natürlich werden im ersten Schritt noch nicht alle BPMN 2.0 Features unterstützt, viel mehr wird [...] [...] erstes lauffähiges (!) Beispiel hat Joram vom jBPM-Team auch bereits online gestellt: jBPM goes BPMN. Natürlich werden im ersten Schritt noch nicht alle BPMN 2.0 Features unterstützt, viel mehr wird [...]

]]> By: Process for the Enterprise » Blog Archive » jBPM supporting BPMN2 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/2009/12/04/jbpm-goes-bpmn/comment-page-1/#comment-3928 Process for the Enterprise » Blog Archive » jBPM supporting BPMN2 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:27:18 +0000 http://www.jorambarrez.be/blog/?p=552#comment-3928 [...] by Scott Francis Pretty interesting update from Joram Barrez on jBPM – looks like it now supports BPMN2.0. (or, more accurately, it will come January [...] [...] by Scott Francis Pretty interesting update from Joram Barrez on jBPM – looks like it now supports BPMN2.0. (or, more accurately, it will come January [...]

]]>